[KyOSS Discuss] JSLOU list now working!
johnhicks at gulfbridge.net
Sat Oct 5 03:40:48 EDT 2013
Finally got it. My postfix virtual alias file (not /etc/aliases) was
intercepting and rerouting mail to jslou.
(I was wrong about mail hitting the /etc/alias table first. It hits the
postfix/virtual table first.)
So you can now subscribe to the JSLOU Javscript list by sending email to
jslou-subscribe at kyoss.org <mailto:jslou at kyoss.org>
Sorry for the delay!
On 10/05/2013 01:35 AM, John Hicks wrote:
> Well, apparently I can't set up a mailing list under pressure. Still
> working on JSLOU. (Actually I'm stumped at the moment.)
> * Mailman says the list is there.
> * I have updated my aliases file and run newaliases.
> * I have restarted postfix.
> * I've waited the "minute or two" for the new aliases to take effect.
> * But posts still go straight through to postfix and the kyoss
> inbox. (They should be intercepted by the aliases.db and rerouted
> to mailman before seeing postfix.)
> Any mailmanmen out there? (or women?)
> On 10/04/2013 10:49 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
>> Did anyone get the message I sent regarding the Harp server? It was
>> sent to the jslou list only.
>> On Oct 4, 2013 9:56 PM, "Alex Bezuska" <abezuska at gmail.com
>> <mailto:abezuska at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I am about to check out the challenge. I haven't sent anything
>> out on the JSLou mailman group yet, but I will before the next
>> meeting (oct 16) and if we have any other gatherings.
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Hal Burgiss <hal at burgiss.net
>> <mailto:hal at burgiss.net>> wrote:
>> I am definitely getting some, but not sure "all" of them.
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Chris Rockwell
>> <chris at chrisrockwell.com <mailto:chris at chrisrockwell.com>> wrote:
>> Crap, I'm glad I didn't start it. I came across it at
>> work; ill have to set aside some time this weekend.
>> Side note: can anyone confirm they are receiving messages
>> from the jslou group?
>> On Oct 4, 2013 5:35 PM, "John Hicks"
>> <johnhicks at gulfbridge.net
>> <mailto:johnhicks at gulfbridge.net>> wrote:
>> um, 70 minutes, 43 seconds here :(
>> guess I needed that practice
>> (I was confused when level five came up and said we
>> would be doing recursion. I was doing recursion in
>> level 4 (longest string). Was I wrong?)
>> On 10/04/2013 02:23 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
>>> Looks fun (WARNING: turn your volume down, annoying
>>> Chris Rockwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the KyOSS-Discuss